Thermal Management of a Graphics Processing Unit (GPU)

A study on forced convection and conjugate heat transfer in PCB assemblies, covering the Navier-Stokes equations, energy conservation, and numerical modeling in Ansys Icepak.

Conjugate Heat Transfer in Electronics

Electronics cooling is a classic Conjugate Heat Transfer (CHT) problem, where heat is transferred via conduction through solid components (silicon chips, FR4 PCB) and subsequently removed by a moving fluid (air) through convection.

In this project, a high-power AGP chip was modeled with an aluminum-extruded heatsink and a forced-air fan system to solve the coupled behavior of fluid flow and solid temperature distribution.

The simulation model represents a high-performance PCB assembly designed in Fusion 360 and analyzed in Ansys Icepak. The system consists of several critical heat-generating modules, each serving a distinct functional role:

GPU Model Setup

(a) Electonics GPU Model

Heatsink Temperature

(b) Heatsink Temperature Map

Figure 1: Design for analysis (a) The full PCB assembly featuring the primary AGP chip, DDR memory modules, and the cooling solution and (b) heat sink to provide controlled cooling of AGP module.

Governing Equations

To simulate the airflow, Icepak solves the Navier-Stokes equations, which describe the conservation of mass and momentum for a Newtonian fluid:

Continuity Equation (Mass Conservation)

\(\nabla \cdot \mathbf{u} = 0\)

Momentum Equation (Newton’s Second Law for Fluids)

\(\rho \left( \frac{\partial \mathbf{u}}{\partial t} + \mathbf{u} \cdot \nabla \mathbf{u} \right) = -\nabla p + \mu \nabla^2 \mathbf{u} + \mathbf{f}\)

Where $\mathbf{u}$ is the velocity vector, $\rho$ is the density of air, $p$ is the pressure, and $\mu$ is the dynamic viscosity.

The Energy Equation

The temperature distribution across the PCB and through the cooling fins is governed by the energy equation:

\[\rho C_p \left( \frac{\partial T}{\partial t} + \mathbf{u} \cdot \nabla T \right) = \nabla \cdot (k \nabla T) + \dot{q}\]

where:

Modeling Forced Convection

To achieve high accuracy, the simulation utilizes several specialized modeling techniques within the Ansys Icepak environment.

Optimized Mesh and Elements

The model utilizes a fine meshing strategy with a total count of approximately 500,000 elements. Icepak-optimized objects are employed to handle complex geometries efficiently:

Thermal Network Definitions

For the AGP and Bridge components, we move beyond simple solid blocks to a Circuit Model (Two-Resistor Model) approach. This defines the thermal path using:

Turbulence Modeling

The fluid dynamics are solved using a two-equation turbulence model (such as $k-\epsilon$ or $k-\omega$). This approach provides the necessary fidelity to resolve the turbulent kinetic energy and dissipation rates as air moves through the restricted channels of the heatsink fins.

Transient Thermal Analysis

The following results visualize the final thermal state and the transient journey of the GPU assembly under a 350-second operational load.

1. Steady-State Temperature Distribution

The final temperature contour reveals a maximum temperature of 123.48°C, localized at the AGP junction. A closer inspection of the heatsink shows a peak temperature of 98.43°C at its base. The speed contour illustrates the effectiveness of the dual-fan setup. Air reaches a maximum velocity of 15.65 m/s at the fan exhaust.

Final Temperature Contour

(a) Full PCB Surface Temperature

Velocity Fields

(b) Velocity Fields

Figure 2: Thermal results showing (a) the global surface distribution with an AGP peak of 123.48°C and (b) Velocity magnitude plot highlighting targeted cooling streams from the axial fans.

The heatsink effectively pulls heat away from the AGP, as evidenced by the temperature gradient across the fins (ranging from ~98°C at the base to lower temperatures at the tips). The surrounding DDR modules also show significant thermal elevation, necessitating their inclusion in the forced-convection path.

2. Convergence and Residuals

The “Monitor Temperature” plot tracks the real-time heating of individual components. The numerical health of the simulation is confirmed by the Residual Plot.

Temperature Monitor

(a) Temperature Monitor

Velocity Fields

(b) Velocity Fields

Figure 3: Heating curves showing the AGP Junction stabilizing after approximately 300 seconds. (a) Heating curves showing the AGP Junction stabilizing after approximately 300 seconds and (b) Convergence history showing stable residuals for continuity, energy, and momentum.

Specifically, the Energy residual (green line) dropped to the 1E-08 range, which is well below the standard 1E-07 requirement for electronics cooling. The stability of the velocity residuals ($X, Y, Z$) confirms that the two-equation turbulence model successfully resolved the complex flow through the heatsink fins without oscillating or diverging.